Monday, August 3, 2015

Where do Nigeria’s top graduates go?


CHUKS OLUIGBO
 
Sidney Hook, an American philosopher of the Pragmatist school, once contended that “the teacher is the heart of the educational system”. If this is so, shouldn’t nations desirous of developing high-quality human resources strive to attract and retain the best brains in the teaching profession? The answer, in my opinion, is that they should. For, as Lee Iacocca, the American automobile executive who spearheaded the development of Ford Mustang and Pinto cars while at the Ford Motor Company in the 1960s, once quipped, “In a completely rational society, the best of us would be teachers and the rest of us would have to settle for something less.”

Some countries of the world are already walking this path. In an article “Raising Teacher Quality around the World”, Vivien Stewart, senior adviser (education) and former vice president at Asia Society, reckons that “as countries face the challenges of a global knowledge economy that requires them to develop higher levels of knowledge and new capacities in their students, they are focusing intently on ways to attract high-quality candidates into the teaching profession”.

"High-performing countries build their human resource systems by putting the energy upfront; they concentrate on attracting, preparing, and supporting good teachers and nurturing teacher leadership talent," she writes.

Finland and Singapore are at the forefront of this drive. While in Finland teaching has become a highly sought-after career – in fact, the number one choice of Finland’s best and brightest students – Singapore selects prospective teachers from the top one-third of its secondary school class. In these countries, “strong academics are essential, along with a commitment to the profession and to serving the nation's diverse students”. In Finland (and Singapore and South Korea), 100 percent of teachers are from the “top third”. 

This can be replicated in Nigeria – across all levels of education. Indeed, available evidence suggests that this was once the practice in Nigerian universities, where top-of-the-class graduates were offered automatic employment as graduate assistants, from where they proceeded to earn further degrees and grew through the ranks. But not anymore. 

Obadiah Mailafia, a former deputy governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, in a recent article “What do the Nigerian people want?”, writes: "During our time it was the most brilliant minds who remained to teach in the universities. The average ones went into banking and the oil industry. When the universities were brought to their knees by the semi-literate military junta, the best minds fled abroad while a good number went into banking and the oil and gas sector. Ominously, the plodders became the professors. It is a dangerous development. These were the kind of people who felt nothing about selling grades and handouts and pestering young female students for sex in exchange of grades. Throughout my years as an undergraduate of Ahmadu Bello University, such a thing was never ever heard of. The system collapsed after our time and the citadels of learning became, sadly, an open cesspool of cultism, whoredom and violence. Today, some of those who call themselves ‘graduates’ cannot pass the most basic of international literacy tests.”

But the rot goes even deeper. A pilot ICPC/NUC University System Study and Review (USSR) of corruption in the university system in 2012 identified a series of infractions including admissions racketeering, misapplication and embezzlement of funds, sale of examination questions, inducement to manipulate awards of degrees, direct cheating during examinations, deliberate delays in the release of results, victimisation of students by officials, lack of commitment to work by lecturers, and above all, sexual harassment and exploitation of students by lecturers.

However, the country may be on the path to getting it right if the recently announced National Youth Service Corps policy of deploying Nigerian graduates with First Class degrees to tertiary institutions as lecturers is properly implemented. 

At a two-day pre-mobilisation workshop for the 2015 Batch ‘B’ NYSC programme in Kaduna recently, the NYSC director-general, Johnson Olawumi, announced that in order to properly mobilise the right manpower to boost the education sector, “All corps members who graduated with First Class honours, Distinction degrees and Diplomas will be posted to tertiary institutions for effective utilisation of their manpower. The posting policy of the scheme is being vigorously implemented for the achievement of the desired impact. I, therefore, appeal to the authorities of all tertiary institutions of learning to reciprocate this gesture by accepting and offering them permanent appointments after service.”

This policy will not clean up the whole mess in the tertiary education system, no doubt – partly because First Class graduates are not necessarily saints, and partly because the issues go beyond just quality of teachers – it is nonetheless a first necessary step in a journey of many thousand miles. Let's first get the right quality of teachers. Our institutions of higher learning are today replete with accidental lecturers – some of whose only recommendation is that they knew someone who knew someone who knew someone – while some of our best brains on whom the responsibility of raising a sound generation should naturally fall are wasting their brains in sometimes unimaginable jobs and places. Same goes for other levels of education.

It needs to be stressed that building a high-quality teacher workforce does not happen by accident; it requires deliberate policy choices. Nigeria must therefore look to Finland, Singapore, and perhaps South Korea, for the best examples. No doubt, in a multi-sectoral economy where education has to compete with other sectors for talent, attracting the best brains to the teaching profession is not enough; efforts must be made to retain them. Of course, those efforts will come at extra cost. And why not? As Bob Talbert has let us know, “Good teachers are costly, but bad teachers cost more.”

Tuesday, January 6, 2015

Nigeria: No more of these accidental leaders



CHUKS OLUIGBO

Reading through Governor Babatunde Fashola’s remarks at the 2014 Christmas Eve party of Island Club/Yoruba Tennis Club in Lagos the other day, something struck me: the vote of confidence the Lagos State governor passed on Akinwunmi Ambode, the man whom his party, the All Progressives Congress (APC), has chosen to succeed him – that is, if elected at this year’s governorship election in the state.

Akinwunmi Ambode served with me as accountant-general for six years. He worked in the local government for many years. He was part of the building process. He understands how government works; he will not be guessing on day one if you elect him as my successor because he is experienced. The alternatives to him will be an experiment with your lives, your businesses and the future of your children,” Fashola had said.

The above statement is very instructive. What it says, simply, is: experience counts. Chinua Achebe’s assertion in his 1983 book, The Trouble with Nigeria – that “the trouble with Nigeria is simply and squarely a failure of leadership" – has become some kind of singsong among Nigerians. Everybody agrees. And not many pundits will dispute the fact that part of this leadership problem is the lack of preparedness among the leaders we’ve had in this country since independence. Experience does matter a lot. And with it comes preparedness to lead. Though it can be argued that even with all the experience in this world some leaders still fail, yet inexperienced, ill-prepared and accidental leadership is worse.

There is a generally held view that Nigeria since independence has lived with the curse of accidental and unprepared leadership – from Balewa through the incumbent Goodluck Jonathan – and this has been the bane of our development. As Tajudeen Alabede, a commentator, wrote in a September 2010 article, “Accidental ascendancy to leadership is a big gamble. It often comes with bitter consequences. We have not been blessed with capable and well prepared leaders whether under democracy or military rule. We have only had flashes of great performers on the centre stage. With not too many glittering moments, the memories have been fleeting indeed.”

To buttress this point, I refer to an article by Reuben Abati when he was still on this side of the fence. Entitled “The speech Jonathan shouldn’t have made”, the article was a reaction to a speech made by the then newly-elected President Goodluck Jonathan at a pre-inauguration lecture on May 26, 2011. While responding to a presentation by the guest lecturer, Ladipo Adamolekun, Jonathan reportedly declared that four years were too short for a president or a governor to embark on any meaningful programme because “it takes about a year or two before the administration settles down even with the right set of ministers or commissioners. Then, if the latter turn out ‘not to be good’, after one year or two, the president or governor is compelled to reshuffle his cabinet and by the time the new cabinet settles down, it is time for another election, and everyone is busy trying to win an election”.

To the above claim, Abati responds point-blank: “It is not true that four years ‘is too short’ for a president or a governor to make a difference. The president didn't get it, and it is important that he does. The period appears too short because many of our elected governors and presidents (well, we have had only a few) begin to think of what to do only when they get to office. They have no blueprint, no clear understanding of what is required; they do not even listen to the people well enough, and the parties that brought them to power have no manifesto, no plan of action, no defined contract with the Nigerian people. Given such background, the complexity of bureaucracy and the enormity of official powers could prove so intimidating that the typical overnight man of power could find himself or herself completely ill-prepared for high office. But this is what we want changed. In states where the governors are prepared, we have seen so much done in four years.”

Then he goes on to cite Gbenga Daniel, Bola Tinubu, Babatunde Fashola, Rotimi Amaechi, Emmanuel Uduaghan, Bukola Saraki, Mohammed Goje, Adamu Aliero and Godwin Akpabio who, in his view, made great impressions and strides in their first four years. Whether you agree with Abati or not on this list is all up to you, but I think the point is clearly made.

And he goes on to offer a piece of advice. “We all know it takes a while for the wrong kind of ministers and commissioners to settle down, and that such persons can waste everyone's time, but those are not the kind of ministers Nigerians want. Nigerians want President Jonathan to choose his cabinet wisely. He must avoid failed politicians who lost elections and are looking for another job in government by any means, PDP chieftains who expect to be rewarded for their contributions in their states, and definitely not the wives, sons and daughters of self-appointed godfathers and political entrepreneurs. Nigerians don't want ministers who will take two years to settle down. They don't want the federal cabinet to be turned into a classroom where ministers have to spend a whole year learning what a policy means, while they collect fat allowances and do nothing.”

Finely put, you would say again. And that goes for all those who will emerge at different levels in the 2015 general elections. At this stage, Nigeria’s democracy can no longer be referred to as nascent or fledgling. A child born 16 years ago should be in an institution of higher learning by now. If such a child is female, she might even be considering marriage – that is, if she is from those parts of the country where early marriage is the norm. So, for a country that needs leapfrogging in many aspects of its economic and social life, Nigeria can no longer afford the luxury of time-wasters.

Perhaps it is time for those elected to lead to take the issue of succession more seriously. I’ve always subscribed to the saying that success without successor is equal to failure. While I do not support imposition of any kind, even if it comes in the form of enlightened despotism, I believe, however, that a good leader should be able to groom a number of possible successors so that when the time comes for him to bow out, the people would have a bunch to choose from. Isn’t it interesting to hear Fashola say that “almost all of the aspirants have worked in our government and with me in building the progress we now have”? That’s the way to go if we are to have true leaders who will hit the ground running from day one.