Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Lagos as the Mother City: A Review of Olasupo Shasore’s Possessed – A History of Law and Justice in the Crown Colony of Lagos, 1861-1906



By CHUKS OLUIGBO

When you have read Olasupo Shasore’s Possessed – A History of Law and Justice in the Crown Colony of Lagos, 1861-1906, you would no longer be in doubt regarding the special status of Lagos within the Nigerian context. While it has never been in question that the Kingdom of Lagos by far predates modern-day Nigeria, it has perhaps never before come out so glaringly that Lagos was indeed an independent, sovereign nation-state before the British invasion and bombardment of 1851, more than half a century before the term Nigeria was coined by Flora Shaw.

 

To do justice to the subject matter, the author divides the book into eight chapters, namely, The Lagos Kingdom in the Law Courts, 26 Upper King Street – Legal and Traditional Settings, Bombardment and War on Lagos 1851, The 19th Century Treaties, To Do Justice to this Place – Legal History, Challenge To Authority – The Eleko, Land and Property Ownership, and The Sun Sets on The Colony of Lagos. He goes further to add an ‘Afterword’ and ‘Appendices’ as well as reproduce pictures and documents that not only embellish the work but also aid the reader’s understanding of facts.

The beauty of Shasore’s account lies essentially in its close attention to detail – no detail is too minute to escape the thorough researcher in him. The author records that by 1850, Lagos had an estimated population of 30,000 people who predominantly spoke the Oyo dialect of what was to be later widely referred to as Yoruba. The small port city-state was a monarchy ruled by the Ologun (or possibly Eleko or later Oba), and its political power structure rested on this dynastic line, a line that had by this time been in continuous rule for over 200 years. And so, Lagos is not a ‘no man’s land’, and to continue to bandy such falsehood reflects “poor learning, ignorance and mischief”.

The contribution of Lagos to the making of modern Nigeria comes out clearly in Possessed. Having severed itself from the Benin Kingdom and asserted its independence by discontinuing the payment of tributes to the Oba at Benin, and having by this time acquired great prominence and wealth, Lagos proved too powerful to be challenged by any local authority. It took only the superior naval power of Britain to subdue Lagos, but not without stiff resistance from the Lagos Africans. The British bombarded Lagos in 1851, and in 1861 took active possession of the island city-state with the fraud called the Treaty of Cession of 1861. With the establishment of formal authority, it became, effectively, The Crown Colony of Lagos, “with a flag, its own constitution, government and subjects, some 53 years before the establishment of Nigeria”. The need to harness the resources of Lagos would in 1906 lead to its forced amalgamation with the Southern Protectorate, and in 1914, the absence of funds to run the Northern Protectorate necessitated the creation of Nigeria through amalgamation in order, it would appear, to run the whole country with resources from Lagos.

So, whether in the pre-colonial, colonial or post-colonial era, Lagos played – and continues to play – “a prominent, inevitable, eminent role” in West African trade and society as well as in the making of modern Nigeria. As Shasore argues, “Without Lagos and the events that led to intervention in its internal affairs, the entire atmosphere for amalgamation may not have been contrived. In some ways, Lagos is the mother city. This is no less than Lagos deserves, for it endured its own tribulations in the constituent formation of Nigeria” (p.22).    

As he says elsewhere in the book, had there not been first the Lagos Consulate and then the first imperial colony established by the British in the Gulf of Guinea area in 1861, there may not have been, in all likelihood, the country which some 50 years later was to be known as Nigeria, at least as we now know it.

Again, Possessed throws up an alternative narrative regarding the true reason behind British ‘possession’ of Lagos (for, indeed, Lagos was a British possession from 1861). And contrary to what Eurocentric historians would have us believe, the author argues, with evidence-backed facts, that Lagos was never ceded to the British (for cession implies a voluntary handover of territory), but that it was taken possession of by armed force, and that the people of Lagos resisted this possession vehemently. The method of taking possession of Lagos was itself fraught with a lot of bloodshed, a fact that was hitherto un-narrated in books on colonial Lagos.

As the author mentions in the Preface, “The British-controlled narrative of the justification for the bombardment and related events has consistently been the taking over of a slave haven; deposing a usurper king and the saving grace of the British invaders. That narrative is not without some self-serving interest. In any event, we do however see an alternative narrative, that is, a dynastic struggle and legitimate claim for the throne, an imperial quest for an important developing economic harbour and the determined, resistant people of Lagos” (p.6). He goes on to show, through records, especially the minute records of Lord Palmerston, then prime minister and former secretary of state for foreign affairs, that the actual overwhelming British objective in Lagos was trade.

The nomenclature ‘Lagos Africans’ comes out very glaringly, for the first time ever, to refer to people who lived within the territory of Lagos at the time. Of course, it couldn’t have been otherwise for to talk about Nigeria before 1914 is to sound anachronistic. In fact, as the author highlights, names such as Goldesia (in honour of George Goldie) and Negrettia were considered, until Flora Shaw, Lugard’s girlfriend, came up with the name Nigeria.

The author does not mince words in condemning colonialism, which he rightly equates to apartheid. “Colonialism and apartheid are kindred,” he writes in page 273 of the book. “Apartheid’s racial segregation was an obnoxious and abhorrent system; colonialism – the legal establishment, exploitation, acquisition and possession of a territory by foreign power – is no less pernicious. Racial segregation and colonialism are inextricable. It manifested in colonial (white) hospitals, European recreation clubs and racial residential segregation.”

Shasore’s passion for Lagos runs through the eight chapters and 313 pages of Possessed, but this passion does not becloud his sense of judgment or lead him to unduly romanticise the subject matter. But like a thorough-bred scholar, and like the legal luminary (being a Senior Advocate of Nigeria) that he is, he rigorously searches out for evidence, in form of records, body of laws, treaties, legal instruments, decided judicial cases, public inquiries, parliamentary hearings, and other legal material hitherto available in different sources. These records turn out to be “priceless in giving real insight into the motives and motivations of the principal persons that brought about and sustained the colony during its existence” (p.7). This medley of legal stories also has the added advantage, in the author’s words, of offering “an unassailable record from which there can only be a dispute as to interpretation but not on facts, a view that a pure historical analysis may not provide” (p.24). After all, it is not accidental that the book is subtitled A History of Law and Justice.

If the whole essence of scholarship is to add to existing body of knowledge, share new information, and illuminate hitherto dark corners, then Possessed has succeeded as a great work of scholarship. But it has also achieved much more. As Governor Babatunde Fashola of Lagos writes in the Foreword, “Not only does this book share new information, it assists us all with a clear picture of the special status of Lagos in the creation of our country. It sets the scene of a bitter battle fought by the people of Lagos to resist conquest by foreigners and presents a more accurate view of the infamous but false giving-away of Lagos by one of its rulers. It even gives us a sense of the lack of certainty in the mind of the colonisers as to how to execute the plan of possession.”

But no single work of research can claim to have said everything that there is to say about a particular subject matter. And so, Shasore admits to me in an interview, “There are a lot of things that I reflect now that perhaps I could have included, but the truth is that you have to draw the line, otherwise you will never be able to get to the end of this sort of exercise. I hope this is going to be the first in a three-part series, and I hope I will have the time to reflect on some of those things as I go along.”

All in all, Possessed is one great book that every Nigerian must endeavour to read.